666: One Number or Three?

Articles 5 Comments

Any objective reading of Revelation can hardly fail to see the importance of this number within the author's web of historical signifiers.

Revised: 4-March-2014

We read in Revelation 13 of two horrible beasts, rising out of the sea and the earth:

 

And I saw a beast rising out of the sea having ten horns and seven heads; and on its horns were ten diadems, and on its heads were blasphemous names…. One of its heads seemed to have received a death-blow, but its mortal wound had been healed. In amazement the whole earth followed the beast…. Then I saw another beast that rose out of the earth; it had two horns like a lamb and it spoke like a dragon…. [I]t causes all, both small and great, both rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on the right hand or the forehead, so that no one can buy or sell who does not have the mark, that is, the name of the beast or the number of its name. This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person. Its number is six hundred sixty-six. (Rev. 13:1-18, NRSV)

The last details in this passage have caused a great deal of commotion among endtime prophecy teachers, but the scholarly discussion of the number 666 (which properly rejects the speculations of prophecy teachers out of hand) is not as profuse as the subject deserves. I suspect that the treatment that prophecy teachers have given these verses has made the subject somewhat disreputable for serious scholars. Any objective reading of Revelation, however, can hardly fail to see the importance of this number within the author’s web of historical signifiers.

Premium Members
If you are not a Premium Member, please consider becoming starting at $10/month or only $5/month if paid annually:

One Time Purchase Rather Than Membership
Rather than a membership, you may also purchase access to this entire page for $1.99 USD. (If you do not have an account select "Register & Purchase.")

Login & Purchase

Comments 5

  1. Assuming this Preterist interpretation (which BTW I am not against), does that mean we can dismiss the contents of Revelation as being farcical? (Since I haven’t seen the Son of Man show up in the clouds yet, or a heavenly city descend upon Jerusalem)

  2. Clifton Payne

    Very Good article. I appreciate your addressing the subject as most scholars will not touch the subject. Where can I find Aune’s article? I’m not familiar with WBC 52B.

    1. Joshua N. Tilton
      1. Clifton Payne
  3. Joshua N. Tilton

    Readers who appreciate Jack Poirier’s contributions to Jerusalem Perspective will be interested to know that Poirier has revised his article “666: One Number or Three?” New evidence has led him to reevaluate and slightly modify his conclusions.

Leave a Reply